- Brand : Garmin
- Product name : Colorado 300
- Product code : 010-00622-32
- Category : Navigators
- Data-sheet quality : created/standardized by Icecat
- Product views : 23936
- Info modified on : 07 Mar 2024 15:34:52
-
Long product name Garmin Colorado 300 navigator Handheld LCD 206.9 g
:
Colorado 300
-
Short summary description Garmin Colorado 300 navigator Handheld LCD 206.9 g
:
Garmin Colorado 300, 240 x 400 pixels, LCD, 38.9 x 64.8 mm (1.53 x 2.55"), Handheld, Nickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH), 2500 mAh
-
Long summary description Garmin Colorado 300 navigator Handheld LCD 206.9 g
:
Garmin Colorado 300. Display resolution: 240 x 400 pixels, Display: LCD, Display size (HxV) (imperial): 38.9 x 64.8 mm (1.53 x 2.55"). Form factor: Handheld. Battery technology: Nickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH), Battery capacity: 2500 mAh, Battery life (max): 15 h. Weight: 206.9 g, Width: 60 mm, Depth: 35 mm. Interface: NMEA 0183, Supported protocols: NMEA 0183
Garmin
Garmin
Garmin
Garmin
Uk has collected 8 expert reviews for Garmin Colorado 300 navigator Handheld LCD 206.9 g and the average expert rating is 81 of 100. The average score reflects the expert community’s view on this product. Click below and use Uk to see all ratings, product awards and conclusions.
Garmin Colorado review G armin is treading new ground with the Colorado series. An updated appearance and a more structured amount of buttons. The monitor has gained a higher resolution whilst the Rock n Roller makes its appearance. Just as is the cas...
Garmin’s Colorado 300 is a versatile GPS device. It shares some of the problems of the Oregon range, but it has a better screen as well as an unusual control scheme. The device has a two-tone grey and black case that is mainly made of plastic and rubbe...
gpstracklog.com
Updated:
2011-07-31 06:14:58
2011-07-31 06:14:58
Average rating:0
A number of perceived deficiencies in the Colorado series have been documented by forum participants at Groundspeak, which has been compiled into a Garmin Colorado issues list. I wont go into all of them here, but the worse, IMHO, are the following:W...